Friday, August 9, 2013

Journal 2


Progress is measured in many ways, such as in terms of economic, political, and societal improvements. No doubt with the turn of the 21st century, both countries have made progress. But since progress can be measured from any time in the past, this essay will only talk about the progress of modern China and America, post 1950s to the current times. Let’s start with the most obvious and most clearly shown method of progress, economic progress. In the aspect, we can clearly say that in recent times, China has managed to achieve a much better economic progress that America has. In 1950 to 1970s, China’s economy slowed due to the largely ineffective government. It was considered a low income country with its GDP only at 111 USD per capita. However, since its opening up to foreign markets, its GDP has soared at approximately 9% a year, since the 1980s, with the growth in 2011 still continuing strongly at an unparalleled 9.3%. America, on the other hand, does not have such astronomical figures in terms of progress, with 1.7% in 2011. It is still, however the largest economy in the world. This can be clearly explained. China has the world’s largest population, standing at 1.3 billion people. They thus have huge manpower to support to development. Secondly, they exemplify the economic theory of catch up—the idea that per capita GDP of poorer countries will converge with the per capita GDP in richer countries with time. Due to the fact that additional investments are more productive in poor countries, China, at that time would attract more investment. Along with their large labour force, largely market-based economy, stability and openness to trade since the 1980s, it is unsurprising that many countries have invested into China, resulting in extreme economic progress. Even companies in the US are more willing to invest in China than in its homeland, and this has led to a less satisfactory progress in terms of its economy. However, we cannot look at economic progress in terms of GDP alone. China might have had GDP improvement, but have they really created a culture where this rapid growth is sustainable? China’s GDP growth is mainly based on their cheap labour and manufacturing industries, and has stayed this way the past 40 years. Not to say that it does not work, but it will become less and less efficient. When countries find China too expensive to invest in and decide that other countries are more effective, their high speed train of economic progress would grind to a stop, and lead to lots of problems in their economic structure. They have made some progress in other sectors, but industry still stands at 48% of China’s economy, much too large, leaving China very vulnerable. In this sense, China has not made a lot of progress in terms of its diversification of its economy. America, have made more progress, offering higher value added services over China’s manufacturing industries, and puts them at a better position for future stability due to a higher technological development.
I will measure societal progress in terms of the standard of living of the people through wages, affordability of healthcare, affordability of education and affordability of necessities. China in this has also made stunning progress. From the slums and farms that dogged the plains to the sky scraping buildings in Shanghai is a symbol of how far they have come. In the developed part of China, students are all given opportunities to study, and they have very good grades that allow that many opportunities. Their living standard is good, and healthcare is affordable to most in the big metropolitan cities. One bleep could be that house prices are going through the roof, and some youths in China are struggling to afford them. However, the picture is less rosy when we move west of China. In places such as Tibet, Inner Mongolia and Xinjiang, many students struggle to go to school, have adequate housing, and struggle to earn a living. Their lives are less extravagant compared to their urban counterparts, but the reason is in no small part their own fault. They constantly reject Chinese government urbanization attempts due to their willingness to hold on to their culture, and their lack of nationalism towards China. America has a general more all-round success in their people’s standard of living. The government measures pushed through, such as the “no child left behind” policy and the future obamacare policy, have shown American government’s recent will to ensure that all people are able to be educated, and able to receive basic medical insurance. This helps to show that America is making progress in terms of helping the American’s standard of living.
A country’s progress can largely be the result of good governance, so I will briefly talk about the governance of these two countries and how it helps in their progress. China’s Communist party is unrivalled by any other political party, and although this might ensure stability and efficacy, it also gives the people less say in the political matters. America can be directly counter that, the Republican and Democratic parties always strongly contest; neither really gaining the upper hand. However, this has led to lots of debate and criticism from the opposition party whenever one makes any political suggestions. This also leads the government to be more conservative, in an attempt to attract votes from the people. Both help to ensure a stable country that makes continuous progress, though neither can really seem to do anything truly revolutionary to make one’s progress seem more significant than the other. 

2 comments:

  1. I agree with David's point of view that the standard of living in China has made a great turn for the better. Indeed, with the GDP growth at such an astronomical rate, it is no wonder that the government is able to develop the country. However, I personally believe that the development of China would be quite similar to that of Singapore in the early days. In the 1960s, Singapore focused on cheap labour and production of low-end commodities to attract foreign investment, just like what China is doing now, which boosted Singapore's economy greatly. However, as countries around the region became more competitive, Singapore had to diversify its economy or lose out. Similarly, China would not be able to sustain the current economic growth in the long run by just offering cheap labour. Unless the government plans for the future, the economic growth of China would slowly but surely dwindle.

    On the other hand, I disagree with the point that China's education is affordable. Apart from the free primary education, secondary education is increasingly more expensive, especially in private institutions. Having gone to four cities in China last year, I did a comparison on the fees that my various buddies had to pay during their school year. With the exclusion of textbooks and uniforms, almost all students had to pay for tuition fees that even exceeded the school fees in Singapore universities. Furthermore, with such a large country as China, it is impossible for a majority of students to travel between school and home everyday. Hence, they have no choice but to find lodgings in the school boarding house, which requires their parents to pay through their noses again. Despite the growing economy of China and the growing affluence of the people there, many, even those living in urban areas, are still struggling to send their children to prestigious institutions they deem vital for the future success of the latter.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi David,

    I think that your CDE reflection shows that you have read up a lot on the topic. You gave many figures such as the GDPs of both countries, which shows the amount of reading up you did. I agree that the standard of living has greatly improved in China. The GDP figures you showed proves this. With such a growth in GDP, the government of China can provide better standards of living for their people. Together with the lessened corruption as a whole in the country, it is no wonder that the standards of living in China has improved so much.

    However, are the healthcare and education services really affordable to all? Students in China now faces tough competition with their batchmates and nearly all of them take tuition to gain an edge over their counterparts. The tuition is deemed necessary as without it, the student will be deemed to have 'lost out'. Thus, tutors charge exorbitant prices and coupled with the rising school costs, will surely be taxing on the one paying. Also, the cost of basic necessities are also rising, making it less affordable for those 'not affected' by the GDP growth, for example those whose wages had not risen.

    Overall, I think that your reflection is very well thought out and shows that you have done in depth research on the topic.

    Fuyang

    ReplyDelete